4.7 Article

Defining the role of real-world data in cancer clinical research: The position of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages 52-61

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.013

Keywords

Real-world data; Real-world evidence; Randomised controlled trials; Pragmatic trials; Cohort multiple randomised controlled trials; Trials within cohorts; Add-on cohorts; Clinical research; Cancer; Oncology

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The precision medicine paradigm in oncology has sparked interest in integrating real-world data (RWD) into cancer research. RWD studies tend to focus on collecting and analyzing observational data, but randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have the potential to generate strong evidence. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) prioritizes pragmatic trials and trials-within-cohorts to generate robust RWD, but will consider observational research based on the target trial principle if random allocation is not feasible. New EORTC-sponsored trials may also include concurrent prospective cohorts.
The emergence of the precision medicine paradigm in oncology has led to in-creasing interest in the integration of real-world data (RWD) into cancer clinical research. As sources of real-world evidence (RWE), such data could potentially help address the un-certainties that surround the adoption of novel anticancer therapies into the clinic following their investigation in clinical trials. At present, RWE-generating studies which investigate antitumour interventions seem to primarily focus on collecting and analysing observational RWD, typically forgoing the use of randomisation despite its methodological benefits. This is appropriate in situations where randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are not feasible and non -randomised RWD analyses can offer valuable insights. Nevertheless, depending on how they are designed, RCTs have the potential to produce strong and actionable RWE themselves. The choice of which methodology to employ for RWD studies should be guided by the nature of the research question they are intended to answer. Here, we attempt to define some of the questions that do not necessarily require the conduct of RCTs. Moreover, we outline the strategy of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) to contribute to the generation of robust and high-quality RWE by prioritising the execution of pragmatic trials and studies set up according to the trials-within-cohorts approach. If treat-ment allocation cannot be left up to random chance due to practical or ethical concerns, the EORTC will consider undertaking observational RWD research based on the target trial principle. New EORTC-sponsored RCTs may also feature concurrent prospective cohorts composed of off-trial patients.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available