4.6 Article

Usefulness of delivery catheter on accurate right ventricular septal pacing: Mt FUJI trial

Journal

EUROPACE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad027

Keywords

Pacemaker; Atrioventricular block; Right ventricular septal pacing; Delivery catheter; Stylet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the delivery catheter system and the stylet system for right ventricular lead placement. The results showed that the delivery catheter system had a higher success rate in placing the lead to the septum and resulted in a narrower paced QRS width than the stylet system. Therefore, the delivery catheter system is more effective for right ventricular lead placement.
AimsAlthough the delivery catheter system for pacemaker-lead implantation is a new alternative to the stylet system, no randomized controlled trial has addressed the difference in right ventricular (RV) lead placement accuracy to the septum between the stylet and the delivery catheter systems. This multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to prove the efficacy of the delivery catheter system for accurate delivery of RV lead to the septum.Methods and resultsIn this trial, 70 patients (mean age 78 & PLUSMN; 11 years; 30 men) with pacemaker indications of atrioventricular block were randomized to the delivery catheter or the stylet groups. Right ventricular lead tip positions were assessed using cardiac computed tomography within 4 weeks of pacemaker implantation. Lead tip positions were classified into RV septum, anterior/posterior edge of the RV septal wall, and RV free wall. The primary endpoint was the success rate of RV lead tip placement to the RV septum.ResultsRight ventricular leads were implanted as per allocation in all patients. The delivery catheter group had higher success rate of RV lead deployment to the septum (78 vs. 50%; P = 0.024) and narrower paced QRS width (130 +/- 19 vs. 142 +/- 15 ms P = 0.004) than those in the stylet group. However, there was no significant difference in procedure time [91 (IQR 68-119) vs. 85 (59-118) min; P = 0.488] or the incidence of RV lead dislodgment (0 vs. 3%; P = 0.486).ConclusionThe delivery catheter system can achieve a higher success rate of RV lead placement to the RV septum and narrower paced QRS width than the stylet system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available