Is there a u-shaped relationship between load levels and fatigue and recovery? An examination of possible mechanisms

In a previous study, an unexpected u-shaped relationship was observed between load level and fatigue/recovery responses. Moderate load levels resulted in lower perceived discomfort, pain, and fatigue, and shorter recovery times compared to either low or high load levels. This phenomenon has been reported in other studies, but no article has examined the possible mechanisms that might explain this u-shaped relationship. In this paper, we re-examined the previously published data and found that the phenomenon does not appear to be due to the experimental artefact; the u-shape may be due to unexpectedly lower fatigue effects at moderate loads, and higher fatigue effects at lower loads. We then conducted a literature review and identified several possible physiological, perceptual, and biomechanical explanatory mechanisms. No single mechanism explains the entirety of the phenomenon. Further research is needed on the relationship between work exposures, fatigue, and recovery, and the mechanisms related to the u-shaped relationship.Practitioner summary: We examine a previously observed u-shaped relationship between load level and fatigue/recovery, where moderate force resulted in lower perceived fatigue and shorter recovery times. A u-shaped fatigue response suggests that simply minimising load levels might not be an optimal approach to reduce the risk of workplace injuries.

Automated summary

In a previous study, a U-shaped relationship was observed between load level and fatigue/recovery responses. Moderate load levels resulted in lower discomfort, pain, and fatigue, and shorter recovery times compared to low or high load levels. This paper re-examines the data and suggests that the U-shape may be due to unexpectedly lower fatigue effects at moderate loads and higher fatigue effects at lower loads. Multiple physiological, perceptual, and biomechanical mechanisms could explain this phenomenon.