4.5 Article

Temporal stability of intracranial electroencephalographic abnormality maps for localizing epileptogenic tissue

Journal

EPILEPSIA
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17663

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comparing patient data to a normative map has shown promise in identifying abnormalities on interictal intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) for localization of epileptogenic tissue and outcome prediction. However, the temporal stability of these findings has not been established.
Objective: Identifying abnormalities on interictal intracranial electroencephalo-gram (iEEG), by comparing patient data to a normative map, has shown promise for the localization of epileptogenic tissue and prediction of outcome. The ap-proach typically uses short interictal segments of approximately 1 min. However, the temporal stability of findings has not been established. Methods: Here, we generated a normative map of iEEG in nonpathological brain tissue from 249 patients. We computed regional band power abnormalities in a separate cohort of 39 patients for the duration of their monitoring period (.92- 8.62 days of iEEG data, mean = 4.58 days per patient, >4800 hours recording). To assess the localizing value of band power abnormality, we computed DRS-a measure of how different the surgically resected and spared tissue was in terms of band power abnormalities- over time. Results: In each patient, the DRS value was relatively consistent over time. The median DRS of the entire recording period separated seizure- free (International League Against Epilepsy [ILAE] = 1) and not-seizure- free (ILAE > 1) patients well (area under the curve [AUC] = .69). This effect was similar interictally (AUC = .69) and peri-ictally (AUC = .71).Significance: Our results suggest that band power abnormality D_RS, as a pre-dictor of outcomes from epilepsy surgery, is a relatively robust metric over time. These findings add further support for abnormality mapping of neurophysiology data during presurgical evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available