4.8 Article

Green Approach for Rare Earth Element (REE) Recovery from Coal Fly Ash

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 13, Pages 5414-5423

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c09273

Keywords

rare earth elements; coal fly ash; zeolite; resource recovery; waste management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the demand for rare earth elements (REEs) and the vulnerability of supply, there is increasing interest in recovering REEs from waste streams such as coal fly ash (CFA). This study demonstrates a green system for REE recovery from CFA, which addresses both REE scarcity and CFA management challenges.
Due to the growing demands of rare earth elements (REEs) and the vulnerability of REEs to potential supply disruption, there have been increasing interests in recovering REEs from waste streams such as coal fly ash (CFA). Meanwhile, CFA as a large industrial waste stream in the United States (U.S.) poses significant environmental and economic burdens. Recovery of REEs from CFA is a promising solution to the REE scarcity issue and also brings opportunities for CFA management. This study demonstrates a green system for REE recovery from Class F and C CFA that consists of three modules: REE leaching using citrate, REE separation and concentration using oxalate, and zeolite synthesis using secondary wastes from Modules I and II. In Module I,similar to 10 and 60% REEs were leached from the Class F and C CFA samples, respectively, using citrate at pH 4. In Module II, the addition of oxalate selectively precipitated and concentrated REEs from the leachate via the formation of weddellite (CaC2O4 center dot 2H2O), while other trace metals remained in solution. In Module III, zeolite was synthesized using wastes from Modules I and II. This study is characterized by the successful recovery of REEs and upcycling of secondary wastes, which addresses both REE recovery and CFA management challenges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available