4.8 Article

Exogenous Metals Atlas in Spermatozoa at Single-Cell Resolution in Relation to Human Semen Quality

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 19, Pages 7358-7369

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c08838

Keywords

exogenous metals; single-cell; spermatozoa; sperm quality parameters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the associations between exogenous metals in spermatozoa at single-cell resolution and human semen quality, revealing that the heterogeneity and prevalence of exogenous metals were associated with semen quality.
While exogenous metal/metalloid (metal) exposure has been associated with reduced human semen quality, no study has assessed the associations of exogenous metals in human spermatozoa with semen quality. Here, we developed a strategy to explore the associations between exogenous metals in spermatozoa at single-cell resolution and human semen quality among 84 men screened as sperm donors, who provided 266 semen samples within 90 days. A cellular atlas of exogenous metals at the single-cell level was created with mass cytometry (CyTOF) technology, which concurrently displayed 18 metals in more than 50 000 single sperm. Exogenous metals in spermatozoa at single-cell resolution were extremely heterogeneous and diverse. Further analysis using multivariable linear regression and linear mixed-effects models revealed that the heterogeneity and prevalence of the exogenous metals at single-cell resolution were associated with semen quality. The heterogeneity of lead (Pb), tin (Sn), yttrium (Y), and zirconium (Zr) was negatively associated with sperm concentration and count, while their prevalence showed positive associations. These findings revealed that the heterogeneous properties of exogenous metals in spermatozoa were associated with human semen quality, highlighting the importance of assessing exogenous metals in spermatozoa at single-cell resolution to evaluate male reproductive health risk precisely.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available