4.8 Article

Closing the Gap between Carbon Neutrality Targets and Action: Technology Solutions for China's Key Energy-Intensive Sectors

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 11, Pages 4396-4405

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c08171

Keywords

carbon peaking; carbon neutrality; marginal abatement cost; social cost of carbon; cost-benefit analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to achieve its climate targets, China needs a clear decarbonization strategy to address its significant carbon emissions. This study utilizes a model to explore different decarbonization pathways and their cost-benefits under two mitigation scenarios in China. The results show that sector interactions and a more ambitious abatement strategy can have positive effects on reducing carbon emissions.
Facing significant carbon emissions annually, China requires a clear decarbonization strategy to meet its climate targets. This study presents a MESSAGEix-CAEP model to explore Chinese decarbonization pathways and their cost-benefit under two mitigation scenarios by establishing connections between five energy-intensive sectors based on energy and material flows. The results indicated the following: 1) Interaction and feedback between sectors should not be disregarded. The electrification process of the other four sectors was projected to increase electricity production by 206%, resulting in a higher power demand than current forecasts. 2) The marginal abatement cost to achieve carbon neutrality across all five sectors was 2189 CNY/tCO2, notably higher than current Chinese carbon emission trading prices. 3) The cost-benefit analysis indicates that a more ambitious abatement strategy would decrease the marginal abatement cost and result in a higher net carbon abatement benefit. The cumulative net benefit of carbon reduction was 7.8 trillion CNY under ambitious mitigation scenario, 1.3 trillion CNY higher than that under current Chinese mitigation scenario. These findings suggest that policy-makers should focus on the interaction effects of decarbonization pathways between sectors and strengthen their decarbonization efforts to motivate early carbon reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available