4.8 Article

Direct Electrochemical Leaching Method for High-Purity Lithium Recovery from Spent Lithium Batteries

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 11, Pages 4591-4597

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00287

Keywords

lithium recovery; electro-oxidation; spent ternary lithium batteries (T-LIBs); selective leaching; 100 percent purity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recovering lithium from spent ternary lithium batteries (T-LIBs) is a promising approach for sustainable T-LIB development. Chemical leaching methods, widely used in current lithium recovery, pose serious environmental threats and result in low Li recovery purity. In this study, we present a direct electro-oxidation method for lithium leaching, achieving high Li recovery purity of nearly 100% without secondary pollution.
Recovering lithium from lithium batteries (LIBs) is a promising approach for sustainable ternary lithium battery (T-LIB) development. Current lithium recovery methods from spent T-LIBs mainly concentrated on chemical leaching methods. However, chemical leaching relying on the additional acid seriously threatens the global environment and nonselective leaching also leads to low Li recovery purity. Here, we first reported a direct electro-oxidation method for lithium leaching from spent T-LIBs (Li0.8Ni0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2); 95.02% of Li in the spent T-LIBs was leached under 2.5 V in 3 h. Meanwhile, nearly 100% Li recovery purity was also achieved, attributed to no other metal leaching and additional agents. We also clarified the relationship between lithium leaching and other metals during the electro-oxidation of spent T-LIBs. Under the optimized voltage, Ni and O maintain the electroneutrality in the structure assisting Li leaching, while Co and Mn maintain their valence states. A direct electro-oxidation Li leaching approach achieves high Li recovery purity and meanwhile overcomes the secondary pollution problem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available