4.7 Article

Contrasting trends in short-lived and long-lived mesoscale eddies in the Southern Ocean since the 1990s

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/acbf6b

Keywords

Southern Ocean; mesoscale eddies; climate change; trends

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesoscale eddies in the Southern Ocean play a significant role in the transport of heat, carbon, and nutrients. The intensity of the Southern Ocean eddy field has been increasing in recent decades, mainly driven by long-lived eddies. However, short-lived eddies do not show a significant trend in their amplitudes. The increased baroclinic instabilities associated with topography are responsible for the amplitude increase of long-lived eddies.
Mesoscale eddies play an important role in the transport of heat, carbon, and nutrients in the Southern Ocean. Previous studies have documented an increasing intensity of the Southern Ocean eddy field during recent decades; however, it remains unclear whether the mesoscale eddies with different lifetimes have different temporal variations. Using satellite altimeter observations from 1993 to 2020, we found that the increasing trend in the intensity of eddies is dominated by long-lived eddies (with lifetimes >= 90 d), whose amplitude has increased at a rate of similar to 2.8% per decade; the increase is concentrated downstream of topography. In contrast, short-lived eddies (with lifetimes < 90 d) do not appear to have a significant trend in their amplitudes since the early 1990s. An energy conversion analysis indicates that the increased baroclinic instabilities of the mean flows associated with topography are responsible for the amplitude increase of the long-lived eddies. This study highlights the need for a better understanding of the changes in mesoscale eddies owing to their importance in the transport of heat, carbon, and nutrients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available