4.7 Article

A stochastic model of future extreme temperature events for infrastructure analysis

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
Volume 163, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105663

Keywords

Climate change; Extreme temperatures; Heat waves; Shifts in frequency; Duration and intensity; Infrastructure; Building energy modeling; Resilience; Stochastic models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work introduces a stochastic model that fills the gap in infrastructure resilience analyses caused by the difficulty of applying extreme temperature events for future conditions. The model uses historical data, shifts in intensity and frequency based on surface temperature anomaly, and climate scenarios to accurately predict extreme temperature events. The model passed rigorous statistical tests and had acceptable errors when comparing future climate scenarios.
Applying extreme temperature events for future conditions is not straightforward for infrastructure resilience analyses. This work introduces a stochastic model that fills this gap. The model uses at least 50 years of daily extreme temperature records, climate normals with 10%-90% confidence intervals, and shifts/offsets for increased frequency and intensity of heat wave events. Intensity and frequency are shifted based on surface temperature anomaly from 1850-1900 for 32 models from CMIP6. A case study for Worcester, Massachusetts passed 85% of cases using the two-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov p-value test with 95% confidence for both temperature and duration. Future shifts for several climate scenarios to 2020, 2040, 2060, and 2080 had acceptable errors between the shifted model and 10-and 50-year extreme temperature event thresholds with the largest error being 2.67 degrees C. The model is likely to be flexible enough for other patterns of extreme weather such as extreme precipitation and hurricanes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available