On the Different Abilities of Cross-Sample Entropy and K-Nearest-Neighbor Cross-Unpredictability in Assessing Dynamic Cardiorespiratory and Cerebrovascular Interactions

Nonlinear markers of coupling strength are often utilized to typify cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular regulations. The computation of these indices requires techniques describing nonlinear interactions between respiration (R) and heart period (HP) and between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and mean cerebral blood velocity (MCBv). We compared two model-free methods for the assessment of dynamic HP-R and MCBv-MAP interactions, namely the cross-sample entropy (CSampEn) and k-nearest-neighbor cross-unpredictability (KNNCUP). Comparison was carried out first over simulations generated by linear and nonlinear unidirectional causal, bidirectional linear causal, and lag-zero linear noncausal models, and then over experimental data acquired from 19 subjects at supine rest during spontaneous breathing and controlled respiration at 10, 15, and 20 breaths center dot minute(-1) as well as from 13 subjects at supine rest and during 60 degrees head-up tilt. Linear markers were computed for comparison. We found that: (i) over simulations, CSampEn and KNNCUP exhibit different abilities in evaluating coupling strength; (ii) KNNCUP is more reliable than CSampEn when interactions occur according to a causal structure, while performances are similar in noncausal models; (iii) in healthy subjects, KNNCUP is more powerful in characterizing cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular variability interactions than CSampEn and linear markers. We recommend KNNCUP for quantifying cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular coupling.

Automated summary

Nonlinear markers of coupling strength are utilized to typify cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular regulations, and the computation of these indices requires techniques describing nonlinear interactions between respiration and heart period, and between mean arterial pressure and mean cerebral blood velocity. Two model-free methods, cross-sample entropy (CSampEn) and k-nearest-neighbor cross-unpredictability (KNNCUP), were compared for assessing dynamic interactions. The study found that KNNCUP is more reliable than CSampEn in evaluating coupling strength when interactions occur according to a causal structure, and it is more powerful in characterizing cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular variability interactions in healthy subjects.