4.7 Article

A multi-factor optimization method based on thermal comfort for building energy performance with natural ventilation

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 285, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112893

Keywords

Building energy performance; Natural ventilation; Multi-factor optimization method; Thermal comfort; Surrogate model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Natural ventilation is proposed as a potential measure to improve building energy performance. A multi-factor optimization method is introduced to maximize the utilization of natural ventilation. The method uses natural ventilation strategy as the air conditioning system operation strategy and applies support vector regression and particle swarm optimization to predict the energy consumption and find the optimal solution. A case study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of the method.
Natural ventilation is one of the most potential passive measures to improve the building energy perfor-mance. This study introduces a multi-factor optimization method for energy performance of buildings with natural ventilation. To maximize the utilization of natural ventilation, this method uses natural-ventilation strategy (Strategy NV) as the air conditioning system operation strategy. In Strategy NV, the air conditioning system is only on when the natural ventilation cannot fulfill the occupants' thermal needs. Two thermal comfort models and airflow network model are combined to obtain Strategy NV. Support vector regression is applied to train a surrogate model which is used to predict the annual energy consumption in Strategy NV. Introducing the surrogate model as objective function, particle swarm opti-mization is used to find the optimal solution. A case study in hot summer and cold winter climate zone is given to verify the feasibility and correctness of this method. The optimal solution has 656 GJ annual energy consumption in Strategy NV, including 254 GJ annual thermal energy consumption. The optimal solution saves annual thermal energy consumption by 21% in Strategy NV comparing with Strategy FT (full time operation strategy within occupied period). The annual thermal energy consumption of the optimal solution in Strategy NV is at least 26% smaller than that of four commonly used building designs in Strategy NV; and it is at least 43% smaller than that of the four commonly used building designs in Strategy FT. The optimal solution has the least total air conditioning hours comparing with the four com-monly used building designs.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available