4.7 Article

Oxidative fast pyrolysis of biomass in a quartz tube fluidized bed reactor: Effect of oxygen equivalence ratio

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 270, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126987

Keywords

Oxidative fast pyrolysis of biomass; Oxygen equivalence ratio; Fluidized bed reactor; Energy balance; Biochar oxidation; Bio-oil composition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of oxygen equivalence ratio (ER) on oxidative fast pyrolysis of pine sawdust was studied. Oxygen mainly oxidized the biochar, providing the largest contribution to heat demand during biomass pyrolysis for autothermal operation. The biochar yield decreased from 21.03 to 9.5 wt% with an increase in ER from 0 to 11.15%. The addition of oxygen altered the formation and distribution of bio-oil, leading to the consumption of light compounds and promotion of anhydrosugar formation.
The effect of oxygen equivalence ratio (ER) on oxidative fast pyrolysis of pine sawdust was investigated in a quartz tube fluidized bed reactor. The results showed that the introduction of oxygen into fluidizing gas would mainly oxidize the biochar, thus provided the largest contribution to heat demand during biomass pyrolysis towards autothermal operation. The increase of ER from 0 to 11.15% decreased the biochar yield from 21.03 to 9.5 wt%. The enthalpy for fast pyrolysis of pine sawdust was about 1084.49 kJ/kg, and a theoretical ER to achieve autothermal pyrolysis was thus calculated as-3.92%. The addition of oxygen indeed changed the formation and distribution of bio-oil. With ER of 6.47%, although the bio-oil yield decreased slightly, the light compounds in bio-oil (e.g., linear alcohols/carbonyls/acids, furan compounds and cyclopentanones/cyclohexanones) were largely consumed, while the heavy compounds (e.g., phenols/aromatic hydrocarbons and anhydrosugars) were mostly retained with the formation of anhydrosugars being promoted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available