4.4 Article

Sea Spray Generation in Very High Winds

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Volume 73, Issue 10, Pages 3975-3995

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0249.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [0933943]
  2. ONR [N000141410643, N000141310144, N000141210448]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantifying the amount and rate of sea spray production at the ocean surface is critical to understanding the effect spray has on atmospheric boundary layer processes (e.g., tropical cyclones). Currently, only limited observational data exist that can be used to validate available droplet production models. To help fill this gap, a laboratory experiment was conducted that directly observed the vertical distribution of spume droplets above actively breaking waves. The experiments were carried out in hurricane-force conditions (10-m equivalent wind speed of 36-54ms(-1)), and the observed particles ranged in radius r from 80 to nearly 1400 mm. High-resolution profiles (3 mm) were reconstructed from optical imagery taken within the boundary layer, ranging from 2 to 6 times the local significant wave height. Number concentrations were observed to have a radius dependence proportional to r(-3) leading to spume production estimates that diverge from typical source models, which tend to exhibit a radius falloff closer to r(-8). This was particularly significant for droplets with radii circa 1 mm whose modeled production rates were several orders of magnitude less than the rates expected from the observed concentrations. The vertical dependence of the number concentrations was observed to follow a logarithmic profile, which does not confirm the power-law relationship expected by a conventional spume generation parameterization. These observations bear significant implications for efforts to characterize the role these large droplets play in boundary layer processes under high-wind conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available