4.4 Article

Weak Jets and Strong Cyclones: Shallow-Water Modeling of Giant Planet Polar Caps

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages 1841-1855

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0314.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [ATM-0850639, AGS-1032244, AGS-1136480]
  2. ONR [N00014-14-1-0062]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Giant planet tropospheres lack a solid, frictional bottom boundary. The troposphere instead smoothly transitions to a denser fluid interior below. However, Saturn exhibits a hot, symmetric cyclone centered directly on each pole, bearing many similarities to terrestrial hurricanes. Transient cyclonic features are observed at Neptune's South Pole as well. The wind-induced surface heat exchange mechanism for tropical cyclones on Earth requires energy flux from a surface, so another mechanism must be responsible for the polar accumulation of cyclonic vorticity on giant planets. Here it is argued that the vortical hot tower mechanism, claimed by Montgomery et al. and others to be essential for tropical cyclone formation, is the key ingredient responsible for Saturn's polar vortices. A 2.5-layer polar shallow-water model, introduced by O'Neill et al., is employed and described in detail. The authors first explore freely evolving behavior and then forced-dissipative behavior. It is demonstrated that local, intense vertical mass fluxes, representing baroclinic moist convective thunderstorms, can become vertically aligned and accumulate cyclonic vorticity at the pole. Ascaling is found for the energy density of the model as a function of control parameters. Here it is shown that, for a fixed planetary radius and deformation radius, total energy density is the primary predictor of whether a strong polar vortex forms. Further, multiple very weak jets are formed in simulations that are not conducive to polar cyclones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available