4.5 Article

Exergy Analysis and Off-Design Modeling of a Solar-Driven Supercritical CO2 Recompression Brayton Cycle

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en16124755

Keywords

solar-driven recompression Brayton cycle; part-load; supercritical CO2; exergy analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a model developed using EES and SAM to evaluate the operation of two solar-driven s-CO2 RcBCs over a year in northern Chile. The proposed cycle shows higher net power, efficiency, and operational flexibility compared to the literature cycle.
The latest generation of concentrated solar power (CSP) systems uses supercritical carbon dioxide (s-CO2) as the working fluid in a high-performance recompression Brayton cycle (RcBC), whose off-design performance under different environmental conditions has yet to be fully explored. This study presents a model developed using the Engineering Equation Solver (EES) and System Advisor Model (SAM) to evaluate the operation of two solar-driven s-CO2 RcBCs over a year, considering meteorological conditions in northern Chile. Under design conditions, the power plant outputs a net power of 25 MW with a first-law efficiency of 48.3%. An exergy analysis reveals that the high-temperature recuperator contributes the most to the exergy destruction under nominal conditions. However, the yearly simulation shows that the gas cooler's exergy destruction increases at high ambient temperatures, as does the turbine's during off-design operation. The proposed cycle widens the operational range, offering a higher flexibility and synergistic turndown strategy by throttling the mass flow. The proposed cycle's seasonal first-law efficiency of 39% outweighs the literature cycle's 29%. When coupled to a thermal energy storage system, the proposed cycle's capacity factor could reach 93.45%, compared to the value 76.45% reported for the cycle configuration taken from the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available