4.5 Article

Cost Assessment of Centralizing Swine Manure and Corn Stover Co-Digestion Systems

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en16114315

Keywords

anaerobic digestion; bioenergy; carbon credits; manure; renewable fuels; swine

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Livestock in Iowa, US, annually produces over 50 million Mg of wet-basis manure. Although anaerobic digestion (AD) of manure offers various benefits, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions and providing renewable energy, it is rarely deployed at swine farms in Iowa. This study examines the economics of AD systems in Iowa and evaluates the reasons for low deployment. It also explores the production cost impacts of biogas cleaning and injection, manure amendment with biomass, and centralization of digesters.
Livestock in the state of Iowa, United States (US) produce over 50 x 10(6) Mg of wet-basis manure yearly. Biogas production from manure's anaerobic digestion (AD) can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, control odors, and provide renewable energy. Despite these benefits, AD is rarely deployed at swine farms in Iowa. In this work, we explore the economics of AD systems in Iowa to evaluate reasons for low deployment and explore the production cost impacts of biogas cleaning and injection into the natural gas grid, amending manure with biomass, and centralizing digesters across multiple farms. This work presents a static, spreadsheet-based technoeconomic model that embodies literature-based estimates of key system technical parameters, costs, and transportation fuel incentives and permits the examination of various scenarios. Key findings include that under the model assumptions, distributed, farm-scale digesters are not competitive with average natural gas prices in Iowa. A centralized production scenario can be competitive, provided that programs such as the low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS) and the renewable fuel standard (RFS) have sufficiently high credit values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available