4.5 Article

Automated Quantification of Wind Turbine Blade Leading Edge Erosion from Field Images

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en16062820

Keywords

leading edge erosion; wind turbines; wind energy; image processing; image segmentation; convolutional neural network; machine learning

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wind turbine blade leading edge erosion is a significant issue affecting power production. Two machine learning models were developed to automatically quantify the extent, morphology, and nature of damage from field images. Both models successfully identified approximately 65% of total damage area in independent images.
Wind turbine blade leading edge erosion is a major source of power production loss and early detection benefits optimization of repair strategies. Two machine learning (ML) models are developed and evaluated for automated quantification of the areal extent, morphology and nature (deep, shallow) of damage from field images. The supervised ML model employs convolutional neural networks (CNN) and learns features (specific types of damage) present in an annotated set of training images. The unsupervised approach aggregates pixel intensity thresholding with calculation of pixel-by-pixel shadow ratio (PTS) to independently identify features within images. The models are developed and tested using a dataset of 140 field images. The images sample across a range of blade orientation, aspect ratio, lighting and resolution. Each model (CNN v PTS) is applied to quantify the percent area of the visible blade that is damaged and classifies the damage into deep or shallow using only the images as input. Both models successfully identify approximately 65% of total damage area in the independent images, and both perform better at quantifying deep damage. The CNN is more successful at identifying shallow damage and exhibits better performance when applied to the images after they are preprocessed to a common blade orientation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available