4.6 Article

Through-the-scope suture closure of nonampullary duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection defects: a retrospective multicenter cohort study

Journal

ENDOSCOPY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-2077-4832

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of a novel through-the-scope (TTS) suturing system for the closure of duodenal EMR defects of >= 10mm resulted in a high rate of complete closure and no cases of delayed bleeding events.
Background Delayed bleeding is among the most common adverse events associated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of nonampullary duodenal polyps. We evaluated the rate of delayed bleeding and complete defect closure using a novel through-the-scope (TTS) suturing system for the closure of duodenal EMR defects. Methods We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent EMR for nonampullary duodenal polyps of >= 10mm and prophylactic defect closure with TTS suturing between March 2021 and May 2022 at centers in the USA. We evaluated the rates of delayed bleeding and complete defect closure. Results 36 nonconsecutive patients (61% women; mean [ SD] age, 65 [12] years) underwent EMR of >= 10-mm duodenal polyps followed by attempted defect closure with TTS suturing. The mean (SD) lesion size was 29 (19) mm, defect size was 37 (25) mm; eight polyps (22%) involved > 50% of the lumen circumference. Complete closure was achieved in all cases (78% with TTS suturing alone), using a median of one TTS suturing kit. There were no cases of delayed bleeding and no adverse events attributed to application of the TTS suturing device. Conclusion Prophylactic closure of nonampullary duodenal EMR defects using TTS suturing resulted in a high rate of complete closure and no delayed bleeding events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available