4.8 Article

Phospholipid scramblase Xkr8 is required for developmental axon pruning via phosphatidylserine exposure

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 42, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2022111790

Keywords

callosal projections; circuit maturation; phosphatidylserine; phospholipid scrambling; synaptic pruning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mature mammalian brain connectome develops through the extension and pruning of neuronal connections. Glial cells, particularly phospholipid scramblase Xkr8, play a crucial role in the elimination of unnecessary neuronal synapses and projections. This study highlights the importance of phospholipid scrambling by Xkr8 in the pruning of developing neuronal projections, with implications for brain development and hyperconnectivity.
The mature mammalian brain connectome emerges during development via the extension and pruning of neuronal connections. Glial cells have been identified as key players in the phagocytic elimination of neuronal synapses and projections. Recently, phosphatidylserine has been identified as neuronal eat-me signal that guides elimination of unnecessary input sources, but the associated transduction systems involved in such pruning are yet to be described. Here, we identified Xk-related protein 8 (Xkr8), a phospholipid scramblase, as a key factor for the pruning of axons in the developing mammalian brain. We found that mouse Xkr8 is highly expressed immediately after birth and required for phosphatidylserine exposure in the hippocampus. Mice lacking Xkr8 showed excess excitatory nerve terminals, increased density of cortico-cortical and cortico-spinal projections, aberrant electrophysiological profiles of hippocampal neurons, and global brain hyperconnectivity. These data identify phospholipid scrambling by Xkr8 as a central process in the labeling and discrimination of developing neuronal projections for pruning in the mammalian brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available