4.6 Article

Hysterectomy alone vs. hysterectomy plus sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer: Perioperative and long-term results from a propensity-score based study

Journal

EJSO
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages 1037-1043

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.02.006

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Sentinel node mapping; Hysterectomy; Morbidity; Survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective study compared outcomes in endometrial cancer patients who underwent hysterectomy with or without sentinel node mapping (SNM). Data from 398 patients who had hysterectomy and 174 patients who had hysterectomy plus SNM were collected. The SNM group had a longer operative time, but length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, and severe complication rates were similar between groups. Hysterectomy, with or without SNM, was found to be a safe and effective method for managing EC patients.
Objective: To compare outcomes after hysterectomy and hysterectomy plus sentinel node mapping (SNM) in endometrial cancer (EC) patients. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study, collecting data of EC patients treated between 2006 and 2016 in nine referral centers. Results: The study population included 398 (69.5%) and 174 (30.5%) patients having hysterectomy and hysterectomy plus SNM. As the results of the adoption of a propensity-score matched analysis, we selected two homogeneous cohort of patients (150 having hysterectomy only vs. 150 having hysterec-tomy plus SNM). The SNM group had a longer operative time, but did not correlate with length of hospital stay and estimated blood loss. Overall severe complication rates were similar between groups (0.7% in the hysterectomy group vs. 1.3% in the hysterectomy plus SNM group; p 1/4 0.561). No lymphatic-specific complication occurred. Overall, 12.6% of patients having SNM were diagnosed with disease harboring in their lymph nodes. Adjuvant therapy administration rate was similar between groups. Considering patients having SNM, 4% of patients received adjuvant therapy on the basis of nodal status alone; all the other patients received adjuvant therapy also on the basis of uterine risk factors. Five-year disease-free (p = 0.720) and overall (p = 0.632) survival was not influenced by surgical approach. Conclusions: Hysterectomy (with or without SNM) is a safe and effective method for managing EC patients. Potentially, these data support the omission of side specific lymphadenectomy in case of un-successful mapping. Further evidence is warranted in to confirm the role SNM in the era of molecular/genomic profiling. (c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available