4.8 Article

Incorporating pressure-volume traits into the leaf economics spectrum

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 549-562

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.14176

Keywords

capacitance; leaf economics spectrum; leaf structure; leaf water content; photosynthesis; pressure-volume; turgor loss point

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, researchers have been attempting to establish the connections between pressure-volume parameters and the leaf economics spectrum in order to gain a deeper understanding of the relationships among leaf traits. Through both theoretical and empirical evidence, we demonstrated the coordination between turgor loss point and associated traits with net CO2 assimilation and leaf mass per area. By considering the components of leaf mass per area and leaf saturated water content in ecophysiological studies, we can gain a broader perspective on leaf structure and function.
In recent years, attempts have been made in linking pressure-volume parameters and the leaf economics spectrum to expand our knowledge of the interrelationships among leaf traits. We provide theoretical and empirical evidence for the coordination of the turgor loss point and associated traits with net CO2 assimilation (A(n)) and leaf mass per area (LMA). We measured gas exchange, pressure-volume curves and leaf structure in 45 ferns and angiosperms, and explored the anatomical and chemical basis of the key traits. We propose that the coordination observed between mass-based A(n), capacitance and the turgor loss point (pi(tlp)) emerges from their shared link with leaf density (one of the components of LMA) and, specially, leaf saturated water content (LSWC), which in turn relates to cell size and nitrogen and carbon content. Thus, considering the components of LMA and LSWC in ecophysiological studies can provide a broader perspective on leaf structure and function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available