4.8 Article

Complex life cycles drive community assembly through immigration and adaptive diversification

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 1084-1094

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.14216

Keywords

adaptive dynamics; coexistence; evolutionary branching; immigration; ontogenetic niche shift

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most animals undergo ontogenetic niche shifts during their life, but standard ecological theory tends to ignore this complexity. This study investigates how complex life cycles, where juvenile and adult individuals feed on different resources, impact community richness. Results show that under gradual evolution, complex life cycles can lead to both higher and lower species richness compared to simple life cycles with no ontogenetic niche shift. However, complex life cycles can significantly increase species richness when communities are assembled through immigration, as immigrants can occupy isolated peaks of the fitness landscape.
Most animals undergo ontogenetic niche shifts during their life. Yet, standard ecological theory builds on models that ignore this complexity. Here, we study how complex life cycles, where juvenile and adult individuals each feed on different sets of resources, affect community richness. Two different modes of community assembly are considered: gradual adaptive evolution and immigration of new species with randomly selected phenotypes. We find that under gradual evolution complex life cycles can lead to both higher and lower species richness when compared to a model of species with simple life cycles that lack an ontogenetic niche shift. Thus, complex life cycles do not per se increase the scope for gradual adaptive diversification. However, complex life cycles can lead to significantly higher species richness when communities are assembled trough immigration, as immigrants can occupy isolated peaks of the dynamic fitness landscape that are not accessible via gradual evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available