4.3 Article

CONTINENTAL-SCALE RIVER FLOW MODELING OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN USING HIGH-RESOLUTION NHDPLUS DATASET

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12456

Keywords

surface water hydrology; Continental River Transport Models; Mississippi River Basin; RAPID; NHDPlus Dataset; rivers/streams; runoff

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX07AL79G, NNX11AE42G]
  2. Army for Research and Technology through the Engineer Research and Development Center
  3. Geospatial Intelligence Directorate of the Marine Corps Intelligence Activity
  4. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  5. NASA [NNX11AE42G, 147450] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As a key component of the National Flood Interoperability Experiment (NFIE), this article presents the continental scale river flow modeling of the Mississippi River Basin (MRB), using high-resolution river data from NHDPlus. The Routing Application for Parallel computatIon of Discharge (RAPID) was applied to the MRB with more than 1.2 million river reaches for a 10-year study (2005-2014). Runoff data from the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model was used as input to RAPID. This article investigates the effect of topography on RAPID performance, the differences between the VIC-RAPID streamflow simulations in the HUC-2 regions of the MRB, and the impact of major dams on the streamflow simulations. The model performance improved when initial parameter values, especially the Muskingum K parameter, were estimated by taking topography into account. The statistical summary indicates the RAPID model performs better in the Ohio and Tennessee Regions and the Upper and Lower Mississippi River Regions in comparison to the western part of the MRB, due to the better performance of the VIC model. The model accuracy also increases when lakes and reservoirs are considered in the modeling framework. In general, results show the VIC-RAPID streamflow simulation is satisfactory at the continental scale of the MRB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available