4.3 Article

QUANTIFYING LEGACY PHOSPHORUS USING A MASS BALANCE APPROACH AND UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages 1297-1310

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12453

Keywords

legacy phosphorus; mass balance; nonpoint source pollution; Ozark Highland Ecoregion

Funding

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region VI
  2. Oklahoma Conservation Commission
  3. Oklahoma State University College of Agricultural Sciences
  4. Oklahoma State University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Classic agricultural-conservation practices may not address decades of phosphorus (P) accumulation, known as legacy P. Identifying and quantifying legacy P sources are necessary to identify the most costefficient conservation practices. A method was developed to identify and quantify legacy P at the watershed scale using a mass-balance approach and uncertainty analysis. The method was applied to two nutrient-rich watersheds in northeast Oklahoma and northwest Arkansas. Each P import and export to and from the two watersheds was identified and quantified using a probability distribution and uncertainty analysis. The P retained in the soils, reservoirs, and stream systems were estimated from 1925 to 2015. Over 8.5 and 6.1 kg/ha/year of P were added to the Illinois River and Eucha-Spavinaw watersheds with 53 and 55% from poultry production, respectively. Other major historical sources were attributed to human population and commercial fertilizer. Though currently the net addition of P in the watersheds is small due to the export of approximately 90% of the poultry litter, historically only 14-19% of all P imported to the Illinois River and Eucha-Spavinaw watersheds was removed via the reservoir spillways, poultry litter, and food exports. The majority of the retained P is located in the soil, 3.6-5.8 kg/ha/year, and stream systems, 0.01-3.0 per ha/year.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available