4.4 Article

Meningeal norepinephrine produces headache behaviors in rats via actions both on dural afferents and fibroblasts

Journal

CEPHALALGIA
Volume 35, Issue 12, Pages 1054-1064

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0333102414566861

Keywords

Migraine; headache; norepinephrine; stress; dura mater; fibroblast

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [NS072204]
  2. Migraine Research Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [NS072204]
  4. Migraine Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundStress is commonly reported to contribute to migraine although mechanisms by which this may occur are not fully known. The purpose of these studies was to examine whether norepinephrine (NE), the primary sympathetic efferent transmitter, acts on processes in the meninges that may contribute to the pain of migraine. MethodsNE was applied to rat dura using a behavioral model of headache. Primary cultures of rat trigeminal ganglia retrogradely labeled from the dura mater and of rat dural fibroblasts were prepared. Patch-clamp electrophysiology, Western blot, and ELISA were performed to examine the effects of NE. Conditioned media from NE-treated fibroblast cultures was applied to the dura using the behavioral headache model. ResultsDural injection both of NE and media from NE-stimulated fibroblasts caused cutaneous facial and hindpaw allodynia in awake rats. NE application to cultured dural afferents increased action potential firing in response to current injections. Application of NE to dural fibroblasts increased phosphorylation of ERK and caused the release of interleukin-6 (IL-6). ConclusionsThese data demonstrate that NE can contribute to pro-nociceptive signaling from the meninges via actions on dural afferents and dural fibroblasts. Together, these actions of NE may contribute to the headache phase of migraine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available