4.6 Article

Magnetic resonance study of novel detonation nanodiamonds originated from non-conventional explosives

Journal

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2023.110059

Keywords

Nanodiamond; Non -conventional explosives; EPR; NMR; XRD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports on the synthesis of novel detonation nanodiamonds (DNDs) from non-conventional explosives and investigates the variations in their structure and properties. The study shows that DNDs synthesized from different explosive precursors have different ratios of carbon atoms in their core and shell, which affect their paramagnetic defects and nuclear magnetic resonance phenomena. These findings provide new opportunities for precise control of the synthesis and properties of DNDs.
Detonation nanodiamonds (DNDs) are conventionally synthesized from a mixture of trinitrotoluene (TNT) and hexogen (RDX) explosives. It is generally believed that the internal structure of DNDs, which consists of a dia-mond core covered with a partially disordered shell, is very similar in all DNDs. Variations of the properties of DNDs are usually associated with the surface functionalization with various chemicals to obtain a family of different nanodiamonds. In this paper, we report on the synthesis, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) study of novel DNDs synthesized from a few non-conventional explosives, which have not previously been used for this purpose. We show that DNDs synthesized from different explosive precursors display different ratios of carbon atoms in the core and shell. The variation of this ratio correlates well with variations in the content of paramagnetic defects and 13C nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rates. The presented data advances new opportunities for controllable synthesis of DNDs with engineered properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available