4.4 Article

Disparities in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use Among Women of Reproductive Age with Type 1 Diabetes in the T1D Exchange

Journal

DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 201-205

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2022.0412

Keywords

Type 1 diabetes; Periconception; Pregnancy; Women; Disparities; Continuous glucose monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied the characteristics of CGM use in women of reproductive age with T1D. The frequency of CGM increased from 2015 to 2018 and was more common among women who recently had a pregnancy. Factors associated with lower odds of CGM use included race/ethnicity, age, education, income, and insurance type. CGM use was linked to better glycemic control but was not associated with a difference in the odds of severe hypoglycemia.
We identified characteristics associated with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use in women of reproductive age with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the T1D Exchange clinic registry from 2015 to 2018. Among 6643 assessed women, the frequency of CGM increased from 2015 to 2018 (20.6% vs. 30.0%; adjusted odds ratios [aOR]: 1.72; confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.51-1.95) and was more likely with recent pregnancy (45.3% vs. 25.8%; aOR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.23-2.16). Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic race and ethnicity, younger age, lower educational attainment, lower income, and Medicaid insurance were associated with lower odds of CGM. The use of CGM was associated with lower odds of diabetic ketoacidosis and lower hemoglobin A1c without any difference in the odds of symptomatic severe hypoglycemia. In conclusion, although CGM use was associated with better glycemic control, the majority of reproductive-age women still did not use it. Those who did not use CGM were more likely to be those at greatest risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available