4.5 Article

Diabetes and Covid-19: Diabetes research funding and support during the pandemic

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 198, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110597

Keywords

Diabetes mellitus; Research funding; Covid-19

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A survey conducted by EURADIA between late 2020 and early 2022 aimed to understand the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on funding for diabetes research in Europe. The majority of respondents reported a moderate impact, with reduced funding and clinical researchers being redeployed to Covid-19 patient care. It is suggested that a more detailed follow-up on the impact of the pandemic on diabetes research funding should be carried out in the future.
Aims: Between late 2020 and early 2022, EURADIA undertook a survey of organisations and individuals sup-porting or working in the field of diabetes research with the aim of understanding better the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on funding for diabetes research in Europe. Methods: Information was collected via online survey augmented in some cases by face-to-face interviews. Results: Findings were mixed but the majority of those responding suggested a moderate impact of the pandemic on diabetes research activity. Many respondents reported a reduction in funding during the pandemic and many of those involved in clinical research experienced a reduction in research clinicians' availability for diabetes research as they were redeployed to Covid-19 patient care. It was frequently reported that the impact might not be fully appreciated until several years after the end of the pandemic. Conclusions: This preliminary survey suggests there may be a significant impact of the pandemic on all aspects of diabetes research and that a more detailed follow-up on the impact of the pandemic on funding of diabetes research should be carried out in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available