4.7 Article

Anti-TGF-β1 Antibody Therapy in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 953-962

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2015111230

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Eli Lilly and Co. (Indianapolis, IN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TGF-beta has been implicated as a major pathogenic factor in diabetic nephropathy. This randomized, double-blind, phase 2 study assessed whether modulating TGF-beta 1 activity with a TGF-beta 1-specific, humanized, neutralizing monoclonal antibody (TGF-beta 1 mAb) is safe and more effective than placebo in slowing renal function loss in patients with diabetic nephropathy on chronic stable renin-angiotensin system inhibitor treatment. We randomized 416 patients aged >= 25 years with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, a serum creatinine (SCr) level of 1.3-3.3 mg/dl for women and 1.5-3.5 mg/dl for men (or eGFR of 20-60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)), and a 24-hour urine protein-to-creatinine ratio >= 800 mg/g to TGF-beta 1 mAb (2-, 10-, or 50-mg monthly subcutaneous dosing for 12 months) or placebo. We assessed a change in SCr from baseline to 12 months as the primary efficacy variable. Although the Data Monitoring Committee did not identify safety issues, we terminated the trial 4 months early for futility on the basis of their recommendation. The placebo group had a mean +/- SD change in SCr from baseline to end of treatment of 0.33 +/- 0.67 mg/dl. Least squares mean percentage change in SCr from baseline to end of treatment did not differ between placebo (14%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 9.7% to 18.2%) and TGF-beta 1 mAb treatments (20% [95% CI, 15.3% to 24.3%], 19% [95% CI, 14.2% to 23.0%], and 19% [95% CI, 14.0% to 23.3%] for 2-, 10-, and 50-mg doses, respectively). Thus, TGF-beta 1 mAb added to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors did not slow progression of diabetic nephropathy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available