4.2 Article

Highly sensitive single tube B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma minimal/measurable residual disease test robust to surface antigen directed therapy

Journal

CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.22120

Keywords

B-ALL; flow cytometry; measurable residual disease; target therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A single tube flow cytometry assay was developed for monitoring the treatment response of B-ALL minimal/measurable residual disease. The method showed good sensitivity and accuracy, allowing for disease detection independent of CD19 and CD22 expression.
BackgroundMeasurement of minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) in B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-ALL) has become a routine clinical evaluation tool and remains the strongest predictor of treatment outcome. In recent years, new targeted anti-CD19 and anti-CD22 antibody-based and cellular therapies have revolutionized the treatment of the high-risk B-ALL. The new treatments raise challenges for diagnostic flow cytometry, which relies on the presence of specific surface antigens to identify the population of interest. So far, reported flow cytometry-based assays are developed to either achieve a deeper MRD level or to accommodate the loss of surface antigens post-target therapies, but not both. MethodsWe developed a single tube flow cytometry assay (14-color-16-parameters). The method was validated using 94 clinical samples as well as spike-in and replicate experiments. ResultsThe assay was well suited for monitoring response to targeted therapies and reached a sensitivity below 10(-5) with acceptable precision (coefficient of variation < 20%), accuracy, and interobserver variability (kappa = 1). ConclusionsThe assay allows for sensitive disease detection of B-ALL MRD independent of CD19 and CD22 expression and allows uniform analysis of samples regardless of anti-CD19 and CD22 therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available