4.0 Article

Chromosome Analysis of Apteronotus ellisi (Alonso de Aramburu 1957) (Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae) from Upper Paraguay River Basin

Journal

CYTOLOGIA
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages 143-146

Publisher

UNIV TOKYO CYTOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1508/cytologia.88.143

Keywords

Ag-NORs; C-banding; Fish cytogenetics; Karyotype evolution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents the first cytogenetic description of A. ellisi, a species of Apteronotus found in the upper Paraguay River basin. The results show that A. ellisi has 52 chromosomes, including different types of chromosomes and the absence of heteromorphic sex chromosomes. The presence of NORs and heterochromatic regions can be used as cytogenetic markers for A. ellisi, and centric fusions/fissions appear to play important roles in the karyotype evolution and differentiation among Apteronotus species.
Apteronotus include a large number of recognized species, but few have been cytogenetically studied. This study establishes the first cytogenetic description of A. ellisi collected from the upper Paraguay River basin, which presented 2n=52 chromosomes, karyotype composed of 20 metacentric, 20 submetacentric, eight subtelocentric and four acrocentric chromosomes, and fundamental number as 100 for both sexes. Heteromorphic sex chromosomes were absent. A pair of nucleolar organizing regions (NORs) was detected in the submetacentric chromosome pair 13 by silver-staining. Heterochromatic regions were observed in the long arms of the NORbearing chromosome pair. Besides the present data are valuable to help in understanding karyotypic evolution in Apteronotidae. Data from NORs confirmed the tendency of this family in presenting simple NORs sites, similar to the other Gymnotiformes clades. Yet, the presence of little heterochromatin can be used as cytogenetic markers for A. Ellis, and centric fusions/fissions appear to be an important mechanism in the karyotype evolution and differentiation among Apteronotus species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available