4.7 Article

Causal inference based cuffless blood pressure estimation: A pilot study

Journal

COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106900

Keywords

Cuffless blood pressure; Causal inference; Pulse transit time; Amplitude alteration of PPG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using wearable sensing and machine learning techniques, this study examines the feasibility of causal inference for cuffless blood pressure estimation. It first identifies wearable features causally related to blood pressure changes by detecting causal graphs of interested variables. Then, a time-lagged link is employed to integrate the mechanism of causal inference into the blood pressure estimation model. The proposed method outperforms traditional models without consideration of causality, achieving estimation errors of 5.10 mmHg and 2.85 mmHg for SBP and DBP, respectively. This work sheds light on the mechanism, method, and application of cuffless blood pressure measurement.
Enabled by wearable sensing, e.g., photoplethysmography (PPG) and electrocardiography (ECG), and machine learning techniques, study on cuffless blood pressure (BP) measurement with data-driven methods has become popular in recent years. However, causality has been overlooked in most of current studies. In this study, we aim to examine the feasibility of causal inference for cuffless BP estimation. We first attempt to detect wearable features that are causally related, rather than correlated, to BP changes by identifying causal graphs of interested variables with fast causal inference (FCI) algorithm. With identified causal features, we then employ time-lagged link to integrate the mechanism of causal inference into the BP estimated model. The proposed method was validated on 62 subjects with their continuous ECG, PPG and BP signals being collected. We found new causal features that can better track BP changes than pulse transit time (PTT). Further, the developed causal-based estimation model achieved an estimation error of mean absolute difference (MAD) being 5.10 mmHg and 2.85 mmHg for SBP and DBP, respectively, which outperformed traditional model without consideration of causality. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to study the causal inference for cuffless BP estimation, which can shed light on the mechanism, method and application of cuffless BP measurement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available