4.7 Article

Lifespan and medical expenditure prognosis for cancer metastasis-a simulation modeling using semi-Markov process

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107509

Keywords

Cancer metastasis; Monte Carlo simulation; Risk and economic evaluation; Semi-Markov process

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a semi-Markov model to evaluate the risk and economic burden of major cancer metastases. The results show that 80% of lung and liver cancer patients tend to metastasize to other parts of the body, with brain cancer-liver metastasis patients generating the highest costs. The survivors group incurs approximately 5 times more costs, on average, than the non-survivors group. The proposed model provides a healthcare decision-support tool for evaluating the survivability and expenditure of major cancer metastases.
Background and objective: A key reason of high mortality of cancers is attributed to the metastasized cancer, whereas, the medical expense for the treatment of cancer metastases generates heavily financial burden. The population size of metastases cases is small and comprehensive inferencing and prognosis is hard to conduct. Methods: Because metastases and finance state can develop dynamic transitions over time, this study proposes a semi-Markov model to perform risk and economic evaluation associated to major cancer metastasis (i.e., lung, brain, liver and lymphoma cancer) against rare cases. A nationwide medical database in Taiwan was employed to derive a baseline study population and costs data. The time until development of metastasis and survivability from metastasis, as well as the medical costs were estimated through a semi-Markov based Monte Carlo simulation. Results: In terms of the survivability and risk associated to metastatic cancer patients, 80% lung and liver cancer cases are tended to metastasize to other part of the body. The highest cost is generated by brain cancer-liver metastasis patients. The survivors group generated approximately 5 times more costs, in average, than the non-survivors group. Conclusions: The proposed model provides a healthcare decision-support tool to evaluate the survivability and expenditure of major cancer metastases.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available