4.7 Article

Machine learning-based defect characterization in anisotropic materials with IR-thermography synthetic data

Journal

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 233, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109882

Keywords

Defect detection; Composites; Machine learning; Infrared IR Thermography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infrared thermography is widely used for void and defect detection in materials, and the inverse heat transfer problem is solved using the k-nearest neighbors machine learning algorithm to predict defect attributes in composite laminates. The study uses simulated data from finite element analysis to train the ML algorithm.
Infrared (IR) thermography (IRT) is a non-destructive testing inspection technique widely used in numerous applications for void and defect detection in various materials such as fiber-reinforced composites. The IRT implementation requires solving the inverse heat transfer problem, i.e., calculating the defect attributes (e.g., shape, size, location) from a measured temporal and spatial surface temperature variation. This inverse problem, unlike its equivalent forward problem, is ill-posed and the uniqueness of the solution is not proven. To tackle this challenge, the k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) machine learning (ML) algorithm is employed to provide a model for predicting a penny-shaped defect size, thickness, and location in composite laminates. The study is based on simulations and synthetic data produced by ABAQUS finite element analysis (FEA) of the heat transfer model defective composites to train the ML algorithm. The surface temperature vs. time and vs. distance diagrams are extracted from the FEA. The data diagrams are then used to extract the training features of the ML by considering the physics of the problem. This ML is trained by 502 FEA run data sets where firstly 10 features, and then features, are selected from the mentioned FEA diagrams to predict the defect traits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available