4.7 Article

Exploring the role of fibre sizing to the fatigue of glass fibre composites using a novel, reliable micro-fatigue test

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107425

Keywords

Interface; interphase; Interfacial strength; Fatigue; Microbond test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To improve the versatility of single fibre micro-composite tests, this study introduces a micro-fatigue test using a well-characterised microbond setup under cyclic loading. Two distinctive interphase types, a clean glass fibre surface and a model sizing, are controlled on the fibres' surface. The sizing significantly improves the interfacial performance and has the most prominent role in the fatigue lifetime of the microdroplet samples. Finite element analysis is used to evaluate strain-rate dependency and heating related to plastic deformation, demonstrating a well-behaving experimental setup. This method shows promise for further studies on interfacial fatigue and the role of sizing.
Single fibre micro-composite tests are among the most reliable methods for characterising the fibre-matrix interphase. To improve their versatility, this study utilises a well-characterised microbond setup in a cyclic loading case to create a so-called micro-fatigue test. The surface of the fibres is controlled to create two distinctive interphase types: a clean glass fibre surface, and a model sizing. The sizing improved the average interfacial performance in all tested cases, but the role of the sizing was most prominent in the fatigue lifetime of the microdroplet samples. Finite element analysis was used to evaluate the strain-rate dependency and heating related to the plastic deformation of the microdroplet samples in cyclic loading and predicted a well behaving experimental setup. The method offers a promising pathway for further studies on interfacial fatigue and the role of sizing in it.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available