4.7 Article

Fast simulation for Gaussian random fields on compact Riemannian manifolds

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2022.107002

Keywords

Gaussian random field (GRF); Compact Riemannian manifold; Anisotropic GRF; Isotropic GRF; Ellipsoidal Beltrami operator; Ellipsoidal harmonics; Angular power spectrum; Fast simulation scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A fully discrete approximation scheme is developed to simulate centered Gaussian random fields (GRFs) quickly over compact Riemannian manifolds, which can be anisotropic or isotropic. The scheme relies on truncating a series expansion based on the decay of the angular power spectrum, independent of the chosen space and time discretization. The scheme's convergence and error bounds are proven, along with their associated rates of convergence. Three simulation case studies are conducted using the Laplacian and Beltrami operators to find required surface harmonics for different geometrical structures.
develop a fully discrete approximation scheme to fast simulate centered Gaussian random fields (GRFs) over compact Riemannian manifolds. These GRFs can be either anisotropic or isotropic ones. The scheme is proposed by the truncation of a series expansion depending solely on the decay of the angular power spectrum, which is independent of the chosen space and time discretization. The pth moment convergence the scheme is proved and the error bound with its associated rate of convergence determined. Three simulation case studies are conducted by applying the Laplacian operator to find the required surface harmonics for a torus endowed with a Riemannian metric and by applying the ellipsoidal Beltrami and Laplacian operators to find the required surface ellipsoidal harmonics respectively for anisotropic and isotropic GRFs over ellipsoids endowed with two different Riemannian metrics.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available