4.6 Article

Effective Force Stabilising Technique for the Immersed Boundary Method

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 349-366

Publisher

GLOBAL SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.OA-2022-0058

Keywords

Immersed boundary method; lattice Boltzmann method; light particle; force stabi-lization; added mass effect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The immersed boundary method is an efficient approach for simulating finite-sized solid particles in complex fluid flows. However, it has limitations in simulating light particles, both in terms of accuracy and numerical stability. In this work, we introduce an effective force stabilizing technique to extend the stability range of the method for light particles, pushing down the particle-to-fluid density ratio as low as 0.04. The method is thoroughly validated against experimental and numerical data available in literature.
The immersed boundary method has emerged as an efficient approach for the simulation of finite-sized solid particles in complex fluid flows. However, one of the well known shortcomings of the method is the limited support for the simulation of light particles, i.e. particles with a density lower than that of the surrounding fluid, both in terms of accuracy and numerical stability. Although a broad literature exists, with several authors reporting different approaches for improving the stability of the method, most of these attempts introduce extra com-plexities and are very costly from a computational point of view. In this work, we introduce an effective force stabilizing technique, allowing to extend the stability range of the method by filtering spurious oscillations arising when dealing with light-particles, pushing down the particle-to-fluid density ratio as low as 0.04. We thoroughly validate the method comparing with both experimental and numerical data available in literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available