4.7 Article

Imaging the combustion characteristics of Al, B, and Ti composites

Journal

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
Volume 252, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2023.112747

Keywords

Combustion; Aluminum; Boron; Titanium; Imaging; Pyrometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, composites of Al, B, and Ti with KClO4 were prepared using 3D printing, and their combustion characteristics were studied using high-speed videography and pyrometry. The type of fuel was found to strongly affect the combustion characteristics, with Al forming droplets with Al2O3 caps and coalescing before departing the burning surface, while B and Ti formed fractal-shaped agglomerates. The burning particles' temperatures were determined using color imaging-pyrometry. The differences in combustion characteristics were attributed to the physical properties of the fuels and their corresponding oxides.
In this study, we prepare 90 wt% loading composites of Al, B, and Ti with KClO4 by 3D printing and study their combustion characteristics with high-speed videography and pyrometry. Combustion charac-teristics are found to be strongly dependent on the fuel type. For Al, Al droplets with Al2O3 caps form and coalesce before departing the burning surface, while for B and Ti, fractal-shaped agglomerates form. Tem-peratures of the burning particles (droplet/agglomerates) are determined with color imaging-pyrometry. The combustion characteristics are attributed to the physical properties, e.g. melting and boiling points, of these fuels and their corresponding oxides. We observe particles residing and burning on the propel-lant surface for times on the order of similar to 1-5 ms. This is significantly lower than the theoretical particle burn time, suggesting particles undergo incomplete combustion on the burning surface, consistent with the experimental observation that particles continue to burn after departing the surface. The estimated particle downstream burning distance is significantly larger than the observed luminous zone, implying it does not represent the complete flame zone. Since Al undergoes vapor phase combustion while B and Ti combust in the condense phase, burn rate of Al should be drastically higher than B and Ti, However, the differences are not as significant as expected. This is attributed to the formation of much larger droplets for Al that results in dramatically longer particle burn times.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Combustion Institute.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available