4.5 Article

Outcomes of extended total mesorectal excision in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Journal

COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 1423-1432

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/codi.16606

Keywords

extended total mesorectal excision; locally advanced rectal cancer; patterns of failure; pelvic exenteration; R0 resection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study retrospectively evaluated the surgical and survival outcomes of patients undergoing eTME and compared them with pelvic exenteration. The results suggest that eTME may be a safe alternative to pelvic exenteration.
Aim: Extended total mesorectal excision (eTME) is a complex procedure involving en bloc resection of the structures surrounding the various quadrants of the rectum. This study, presenting the largest series so far of patients undergoing eTME, aimed to assess the surgical and survival outcomes of patients following treatment with eTME and to compare these outcomes with historical data on pelvic exenteration.Method: The study is a retrospective review of all patients with locally advanced rectal cancer requiring an eTME (2014- 2020). The database includes the demographic profile, operative details, histopathological features and follow -up.Results: One hundred and sixty three patients who underwent eTME were analysed. The overall Clavien- Dindo complication rate of > IIIa was 21.1%. The anterior quadrant was the most common anatomical site resected (68.5%). The R1 resection rate was 10.4%. After a median follow -up of 28 months, there were 51 recurrences in the study and twenty two deaths were recorded. The local recurrence rate was 7.3% among the study population. The disease -free survival (DFS) and overall survival were 66.7% and 80.4%, respectively, at 3 years. The majority of the recurrences were distant metastasis (84.3%). In univariate analysis, the quadrant involved did not affect survival. In multivariate analy- sis, signet ring histology, metastatic presentation, inadequate tumour response and R1 resection affected DFS.Conclusion: The recurrence pattern, R1 resection rate and survival outcomes of patients in the present study were comparable with those for patients undergoing an exenter- ation. Therefore, eTME is probably a safe alternative to pelvic exenterations when R0 resection is achievable and when the procedure is performed in high-volume specialist tertiary care centres.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available