4.6 Article

Auditory evoked response to an oddball paradigm in children wearing cochlear implants

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages 133-145

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.02.179

Keywords

Cochlear implant; Auditory evoked potentials; Mismatch negativity; Language development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the use of auditory evoked potentials as markers of auditory processing in children with cochlear implants. The results showed that this method could differentiate children based on their language and literacy abilities, and potentially serve as a clinical tool for tracking developmental outcomes.
Objective: Although children with cochlear implants (CI) achieve remarkable success with their device, considerable variability remains in individual outcomes. Here, we explored whether auditory evoked potentials recorded during an oddball paradigm could provide useful markers of auditory processing in this pediatric population.Methods: High-density electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded in 75 children listening to standard and odd noise stimuli: 25 had normal hearing (NH) and 50 wore a CI, divided between high language (HL) and low language (LL) abilities. Three metrics were extracted: the first negative and second positive com-ponents of the standard waveform (N1-P2 complex) close to the vertex, the mismatch negativity (MMN) around Fz and the late positive component (P3) around Pz of the difference waveform.Results: While children with CIs generally exhibited a well-formed N1-P2 complex, those with language delays typically lacked reliable MMN and P3 components. But many children with CIs with age-appropriate skills showed MMN and P3 responses similar to those of NH children. Moreover, larger and earlier P3 (but not MMN) was linked to better literacy skills. Conclusions: Auditory evoked responses differentiated children with CIs based on their good or poor skills with language and literacy.Significance: This short paradigm could eventually serve as a clinical tool for tracking the developmental outcomes of implanted children. & COPY; 2023 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available