4.3 Article

Variations in Penile Cancer Management: Results From the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors Survey

Journal

CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 376-382

Publisher

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.03.001

Keywords

GSRGT; rare tumors; divergence; genital; carcinoma; penis; questionnaire

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given the rarity of penile cancer, the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors (GSRGT) conducted a survey to identify the global variations in disease presentation and various aspects of its management. The results of this survey help identify research areas for multinational collaborative efforts which is a key mission of the GSRGT.
Given the rarity of penile cancer, the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors (GSRGT) conducted a survey to identify the global variations in disease presentation and various aspects of its management. The results of this survey help identify research areas for multinational collaborative efforts which is a key mission of the Introduction: There is paucity of evidence and consensus on various aspects of management of penile cancer (PeCa), which is intuitive considering the rarity of this disease. We present here the details of an online survey conducted by the Global Society of Rare Genito-urinary Tumors (GSRGT) with the aim of capturing the variations in PeCa care across different regions of the world. Materials and Methods: An online questionnaire was developed by experts within the GSRGT and then circulated via email in English and Spanish versions to clinicians dealing with PeCa. Respondents were allowed 8 weeks to reply. Results: We received 102 responses; the majority of them were from South America (37.2%) followed by North America and Asia (17.6% each). Only 11.7% of the respondents treated more than 25 patients with PeCa annually. Total penectomy is performed by 21.5% of the respondents in > 50% of their patients. Less than a fifth of the experts (19.6%) responded that > 50% of their patients are clinically node-negative (cN0) at presentation. For intermediate-risk cN0 patients (T1 G2 cancer), about a third of the experts chose surveillance. For invasive inguinal staging, the options of Dynamic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (DSNB), Modified Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection (MILD), Superficial Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection (SILD), and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) were chosen by 28.4%, 26.4%, 31.3%, and 13.7% of the respondents respectively. Considerable variation was seen in the worldwide use of these techniques. For clinically node-positive patients, respondents were in favor of giving adjuvant chemotherapy instead of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, except for cN3 patients. Conclusion: The results of this questionnaire objectified the variations in global practices in the management of PeCa. This serves as the baseline information which can help pr ior itize research areas for multinational collaborative efforts, a key mission of the GSRGT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available