4.5 Article

Hereditary cancer predispositions: Comparison of multigene panel sequencing on fresh-frozen breast/ovarian tumor versus blood

Journal

CLINICAL GENETICS
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages 107-113

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cge.14327

Keywords

HBOC; MSH6; PARPi; RAD51C; TP53

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multigene panel sequencing is used to diagnose hereditary predispositions in breast or ovarian cancer patients, while BRCA1/BRCA2 testing is for therapeutic purpose. However, tumor genomic instability creates challenges in accurately detecting germline pathogenic variants through tumor testing. Somatic copy number variants and variant allele frequency can mask or distort the detection of germline pathogenic variants.
In breast or ovarian cancer (BC/OC) patients with evocative personal and/or family history, multigene panel sequencing is performed on blood to diagnose hereditary predispositions. Additionally, BRCA1/BRCA2 testing can be performed on tumor sample for therapeutic purpose. The accuracy of multigene panel tumor analysis on BC/OC to detect predisposing germline pathogenic variants (gPV) has not been precisely assessed. By comparing sequencing data from blood and fresh-frozen tumor we show that tumor genomic instability causes pitfalls to consider when performing tumor testing to detect gPV. Even if loss of heterozygosity increases germline signal in most cases, somatic copy number variants (CNV) can mask germline CNV and collapse point gPV variant allele frequency (VAF). Moreover, VAF does not allow an accurate distinction between germline and somatic pathogenic variants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available