4.6 Article

Detection of antinuclear antibodies: recommendations from EFLM, EASI and ICAP

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
Volume 61, Issue 7, Pages 1167-1198

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0209

Keywords

antinuclear antibodies; HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence; recommendations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article summarizes the recommendations and suggestions on the methodological aspects of antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing, including the influence of various factors and the application of new methods such as automated computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems and solid phase assays (SPA). These recommendations, supported by international experts, provide important guidance for high-quality ANA testing.
Objectives: Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are important for the diagnosis of various autoimmune diseases. ANA are usually detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA). There are many variables influencing HEp-2 IFA results, such as subjective visual reading, serum screening dilution, substrate manufacturing, microscope components and conjugate. Newer developments on ANA testing that offer novel features adopted by some clinical laboratories include automated computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems and solid phase assays (SPA).Methods: A group of experts reviewed current literature and established recommendations on methodological aspects of ANA testing. This process was supported by a two round Delphi exercise. International expert groups that participated in this initiative included (i) the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group Autoimmunity Testing; (ii) the European Autoimmune Standardization Initiative (EASI); and (iii) the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP).Results: In total, 35 recommendations/statements related to (i) ANA testing and reporting by HEp-2 IFA; (ii) HEp-2 IFA methodological aspects including substrate/conjugate selection and the application of CAD systems; (iii) quality assurance; (iv) HEp-2 IFA validation/verification approaches and (v) SPA were formulated. Globally, 95% of all submitted scores in the final Delphi round were above 6 (moderately agree, agree or strongly agree) and 85% above 7 (agree and strongly agree), indicating strong international support for the proposed recommendations.Conclusions: These recommendations are an important step to achieve high quality ANA testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available