4.6 Article

Quality standards and internal quality control practices in medical laboratories: an IFCC global survey of member societies

Journal

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0492

Keywords

global survey; IFCC; internal quality control; International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine; medical laboratories; quality assurance; quality management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

According to a survey conducted by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC), there is significant variation in internal quality control (IQC) practices and management worldwide. While 78.3% of countries have regulations or accreditation requirements for medical laboratory quality standards, they are not mandatory in 46.7% of these countries. This highlights the need for standardized programs and education to improve overall quality management in medical laboratories.
Objectives: The trueness and precision of clinical laboratory results are ensured through total quality management systems (TQM), which primarily include internal quality control (IQC) practices. However, quality practices vary globally. To understand the current global state of IQC practice and IQC management in relation to TQM the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Task Force on Global Laboratory Quality (TF-GLQ) conducted a survey of IFCC member countries on IQC practices and management.Methods: The survey included 16 questions regarding IQC and laboratory TQM practices and was distributed to IFCC full and affiliate member countries (n=110). A total of 46 (41.8 %) responses were received from all regions except North America.Results: Of the responding countries, 78.3 % (n=36) had legislative regulations or accreditation requirements governing medical laboratory quality standards. However, implementation was not mandatory in 46.7 % (n=21) of responding countries. IQC practices varied considerably with 57.1 % (n=28) of respondents indicating that they run 2 levels of IQC, 66.7 % (n=24) indicating they run IQC every 24 h and 66.7 % (n=28) using assay manufacturer IQC material sources. Only 29.3 % (n=12) of respondents indicated that every medical laboratory in their country has written IQC policies and procedures. By contrast, 97.6 % (n=40) of responding countries indicated they take corrective action and result remediation in the event of IQC failure.Conclusions: The variability in TQM and IQC practices highlights the need for more formal programs and education to standardize and improve TQM in medical laboratories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available