4.5 Article

Identification of a novel 107 kb deletion in the alpha-globin gene cluster using third-generation sequencing

Journal

CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 113, Issue -, Pages 36-39

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.12.010

Keywords

Third-generation sequencing (TGS); Thalassemia; Deletion; Long molecular sequencing (LMS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel 107 kb deletion causing alpha-thalassemia was discovered using third-generation sequencing (TGS) after other methods failed. The TGS was confirmed by Gap-PCR and Sanger sequencing. This study highlights the importance of TGS as a reliable tool in identifying rare or potential deletions in thalassemia.
Objective: To describe the characterization of a novel deletion causing alpha-thalassemia. Methods: The proband, a 30-year-old female, displayed mild anemia from thalassemia screening. Gap-PCR was used to detect the four common deletional alpha-thalassemia, and a PCR-reverse dot blot was performed for the three point mutations of the alpha-globin gene. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was used to query possible breakpoints of a potential novel deletion. Third-generation sequencing (TGS) was used to identify the novel deletion after the MLPA failed. Gap-PCR and Sanger sequencing were validated for the breakpoint. Results: No abnormal results were detected by Gap-PCR and PCR-reverse dot blot. MLPA only showed a large deletion upstream of the HBZ-1 probe, but the scope could not be determined. However, a novel 107 kb deletion at the alpha-globin gene was discovered by the TGS. The Gap-PCR products with the specific breakpoint fragment of the 107 kb deletion were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Conclusions: A 107 kb deletion causing alpha-thalassemia was the first reported worldwide. TGS played an important role in this study and can be recommended as a reliable tool for rare or potential deletions in thalassemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available