4.1 Article

Intraocular pressure variation from ocular compression in low and high myopia

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2023.2191784

Keywords

Aqueous humour dynamic; intraocular pressure; ocular compression

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) during and after ocular compression and compare the differences between low and high myopia. The results showed that during compression, IOP gradually decreased and returned to baseline levels after the release of the compressive force.
BackgroundRecent studies have monitored lamina cribrosa deformation using optical coherence tomography during ocular compression. IOP was measured only once immediately after ocular compression. This study aimed to evaluate IOP changes during and after ocular compression and compare the differences between low and high myopia.MethodsTwo groups of young, healthy adults were age-matched and underwent ocular compression. IOP was measured at baseline and monitored during a 2-min ocular compression followed by a 10-min recovery phase. Rebound tonometry was used and applied at 30-s intervals.ResultsThirty low and 30 high myopes (60 right eyes) were included in the study. They had similar baseline IOP at 14.9 mmHg. IOP was elevated to 21.7 +/- 3.8 mmHg and 22.3 +/- 4.2 mmHg for the low and high myopic group, respectively (p = 0.877). Low myopes had faster IOP decay during ocular compression at -3.24 mmHg/min than high myopes at -2.58 mmHg/min (p = 0.0528). The IOP dropped below the baseline level after the release of the compressive force. Low myopes had IOP that returned to baseline levels faster (at 360 s) than high myopes (at 510 s).ConclusionMeasuring IOP once immediately after ocular compression could under-estimate the effect of IOP elevation during ocular compression. Further studies are required regarding IOP changes from ocular compression in aqueous humour dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available