4.5 Article

Linking PM10 and PM2.5 Pollution Concentration through Tree Coverage in Urban Areas

Journal

CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/clen.202200222

Keywords

air quality; PM10; PM2 5; remote sensing; tree coverage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Particulate matter, PM10 and PM2.5, are common air pollutants in cities that pose a considerable threat to public health and daily activities of city dwellers. Diesel engine exhaust, brake dust, and vehicle tire particles are the main sources of PM10 and PM2.5 in large cities. The presence of vegetation in urban areas can significantly reduce the levels of these particles, leading to improved air quality.
Particulate matter, PM10 and PM2.5, represents common air pollutants in cities and constitute a considerable threat to public health impacting daily activity of people living in city. In large cities, the main sources of PM10 and PM2.5 are diesel engine exhaust, brake dust, and particulate matter from vehicle tires. These particles can be deposited, filtered, and considerably reduced if there is a vegetative surface in the neighborhoods, thus eliminating a part of these particles and reducing their harmful footprint. This study evaluates the effect of tree coverage in urban areas on PM10 and PM2.5 removal considering air quality monitoring stations. Estimation of tree coverage is made by using high spatial and temporal resolution satellite images from Planet constellations. An empirical relationship between these two variables, with an acceptable correlation (R-2 = 0.478 and R-2 = 0.589 for PM10 and PM2.5, respectively), is obtained. A higher abundance of green space is associated with significantly lower PM10 and PM2.5 values. Preliminary results suggest that the amount of tree coverage do cause some degree of air quality improvement and can be used to inform national clean air strategies aimed at reducing pollutant emissions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available