4.5 Article

Optimum operations and performance comparison of CO2-propane and CO2-R152a mixture-based transcritical power cycles recovering diesel power plant waste heat

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-023-02489-0

Keywords

Diesel power plant waste heat; CO2-based mixture; Transcritical power cycle; Output power; Levelized electricity cost

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using CO2-propane and CO2-R152a mixtures as working fluids can reduce the operating pressure of the CO2 cycle, resulting in higher output power and lower electricity costs.
Though CO2 power cycles are preferred for diesel engine waste heat recovery, a very high operating pressure of the CO2 power cycle is an issue of concern. To address this issue, in the present study, CO2-propane and CO2-R152a mixtures with various CO2 mass fractions are proposed as the working fluid of a regenerative transcritical power cycle recovering waste heat of a diesel power plant. To reduce the possibility of accidental fire hazard; the minimum permissible CO2 mass fraction is restricted to 0.3. It is observed that reducing CO2 mass fraction ensures higher output power and lesser levelized electricity cost (LEC), specifically at a lower turbine inlet pressure. Between two considered CO2-based mixture pairs, the transcritical cycle exhibits a superior performance with CO2-R152a-based mixtures. The LEC of the presented CO2-propane-based optimized cycle is about 6.36% lower compared to that of the optimized supercritical CO2 power cycle. For the CO2-R152a mixture-based cycle, the corresponding achievable reduction in LEC is about 15.20%. Turbine inlet pressures corresponding to the minimum LECs of the optimized CO2-propane and CO2-R152a mixture-based cycles are, respectively, close to 33% and 39% lower than that of the optimized supercritical CO2 power cycle. As R152a is less flammable than propane, an R152a-based mixture working fluid also ensures a safer operation compared to a propane-based mixture. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available