Journal
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 373-385Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.014850
Keywords
body mass index; coronary artery disease; coronary stenosis; obesity; overweight
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the relationship between BMI, CAD, and clinical outcomes using the ADVANCE registry. The results showed that overweight and obese patients had a lower rate of anatomical stenosis, but had a similar burden of physiologically significant disease and rates of adverse events regardless of BMI.
Background: The relationship between body size and cardiovascular events is complex. This study utilized the ADVANCE (Assessing Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive FFRCT in Coronary Care) Registry to investigate the association between body mass index (BMI), coronary artery disease (CAD), and clinical outcomes. Methods: The ADVANCE registry enrolled patients undergoing evaluation for clinically suspected CAD who had >30% stenosis on cardiac computed tomography angiography. Patients were stratified by BMI: normal <25 kg/m(2), overweight 25-29.9 kg/m(2), and obese >= 30 kg/m(2). Baseline characteristics, cardiac computed tomography angiography and computed tomography fractional flow reserve (FFRCT), were compared across BMI groups. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models assessed the association between BMI and outcomes. Results: Among 5014 patients, 2166 (43.2%) had a normal BMI, 1883 (37.6%) were overweight, and 965 (19.2%) were obese. Patients with obesity were younger and more likely to have comorbidities, including diabetes and hypertension (all P<0.001), but were less likely to have obstructive coronary stenosis (65.2% obese, 72.2% overweight, and 73.2% normal BMI; P<0.001). However, the rate of hemodynamic significance, as indicated by a positive FFRCT, was similar across BMI categories (63.4% obese, 66.1% overweight, and 67.8% normal BMI; P=0.07). Additionally, patients with obesity had a lower coronary volume-to-myocardial mass ratio compared with patients who were overweight or had normal BMI (obese BMI, 23.7; overweight BMI, 24.8; and normal BMI, 26.3; P<0.001). After adjustment, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was similar regardless of BMI (all P>0.05). Conclusions: Patients with obesity in the ADVANCE registry were less likely to have anatomically obstructive CAD by cardiac computed tomography angiography but had a similar degree of physiologically significant CAD by FFRCT and similar rates of adverse events. An exclusively anatomic assessment of CAD in patients with obesity may underestimate the burden of physiologically significant disease that is potentially due to a significantly lower volume-to-myocardial mass ratio.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available